{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Aliagaabogados","provider_url":"https:\/\/aliagaabogados.com\/en","title":"NOTICIAS JUR\u00cdDICAS - NEWSLETTER 215 - Aliagaabogados","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HBYxC6YztL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/aliagaabogados.com\/en\/noticias-juridicas-gastos-notariales-newsletter-215\/\">NOTICIAS JUR\u00cdDICAS  &#8211; NEWSLETTER 215<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/aliagaabogados.com\/en\/noticias-juridicas-gastos-notariales-newsletter-215\/embed\/#?secret=HBYxC6YztL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;NOTICIAS JUR\u00cdDICAS  &#8211; NEWSLETTER 215&#8221; &#8212; Aliagaabogados\" data-secret=\"HBYxC6YztL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/aliagaabogados.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/aliagaabogados.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/Recuperaci\u00f3n-impagados02.jpg","thumbnail_width":406,"thumbnail_height":296,"description":"El pasado Martes d\u00eda 6 de noviembre el Tribunal Supremo en pleno decidi\u00f3, con 15 votos a favor y 13 en contra, continuar con la l\u00ednea jurisprudencial que marcaba que seguir\u00e1 siendo el prestatario quien deber\u00e1 sufragar los gastos derivados del Impuesto de Actos Jur\u00eddicos Documentados que derivan de la suscripci\u00f3n de un pr\u00e9stamo bancario. [&hellip;]"}